RagnarokStart With an Audit →
RAGNAROK DESIGN · 2–01 · LABS

Structural Sprint

Correction, not redesign. Sprint targets the highest structural friction, removes it, and validates the result. Scope is defined by audit findings only.

Request Sprint Evaluation →Start with Audit (recommended)
If structural friction is not yet confirmed, start with Audit.
SYSTEM_ORIGIN RF · ISO 241
Diagnostic modeCorrection
ConfidentialityMutual NDA
18.6→7.2 DWI
Pre-analysis to stabilisation window. FSI 57→83. PRI 0.68→0.29.
18.6

Pre-analysis DWI

DWI / high friction
7.2

Stabilisation DWI

–60% DWI
83

FSI after correction, with PRI contained at 0.29.

FSI / PRI contained
// correction window

One system. One targeted fix.

We implement validated structural change, measure behavioural difference, and stabilise the system.

01Scope lock

Scope defined from audit. No additions.

02Implement

Structural change applied with precision.

03Validate

Before/after measurement confirms impact.

// packages

Sprint packages

Audit-defined correction

2-Week Sprint

Contained correction for one validated structural break.

€6,500
2 weeks
  • Audit-defined correction scope
  • Structural alignment implementation
  • Architecture deliverables
  • 1–3 decision analytics targets
  • Friction point resolution
Best when the audit already confirms a specific flow-level break and the foundation is still viable.
Multi-flow correction

4-Week Sprint

Multi-flow correction after structural validation.

€10,000–15,000
4 weeks
  • Wider correction window
  • Scope confirmed only after validation
  • Correction protocol
  • Before/after metrics
  • Implementation handoff
Not available without Audit. The point is correction, not speculation.

Sprint scope is determined only after Audit. If no Audit has been completed, start with Audit first.

Start with Audit →

When you need Sprint

  • Audit confirmed structural friction in a specific flow
  • Foundation is viable but correction is needed
  • Validated friction exists and full rebuild is not required

Sprint is not right when

  • No audit has been done
  • Problem appears brand- or copy-level
  • Architecture is fundamentally broken

We do not sell aesthetics. We implement coherent systems.

Request Structural Evaluation →Request Audit